<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wolfram Alpha</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writtenbyallof.us/2009/05/21/wolfram-alpha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writtenbyallof.us/2009/05/21/wolfram-alpha/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:06:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Harder</title>
		<link>http://writtenbyallof.us/2009/05/21/wolfram-alpha/comment-page-1/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Harder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writtenbyallof.us/?p=1631#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>I have read similar reviews about its limitations. And it&#039;s actually called out in the ZDNet video. I still think it&#039;s a good idea -- whether it&#039;s Wolfram or Google who does it -- to make sense out of the bits of data floating out there in the interwebs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read similar reviews about its limitations. And it&#8217;s actually called out in the ZDNet video. I still think it&#8217;s a good idea &#8212; whether it&#8217;s Wolfram or Google who does it &#8212; to make sense out of the bits of data floating out there in the interwebs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marq</title>
		<link>http://writtenbyallof.us/2009/05/21/wolfram-alpha/comment-page-1/#comment-1525</link>
		<dc:creator>Marq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writtenbyallof.us/?p=1631#comment-1525</guid>
		<description>Wolfram Alpha is a novel toy that is, at best, still in alpha.

I don&#039;t see it really growing out of its tiny computational niche, largely because its keyword parser is even more limited than the datasets it manipulates--ask it &quot;largest cities&quot;, and you&#039;ll get a decent list, but ask it any form of &quot;largest american cities&quot;, and it&#039;ll stare back at you dumbly.

It&#039;s a glorified calculator that can pull data from almanacs--and since Google seems to be adding that ability soon anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolfram Alpha is a novel toy that is, at best, still in alpha.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see it really growing out of its tiny computational niche, largely because its keyword parser is even more limited than the datasets it manipulates&#8211;ask it &#8220;largest cities&#8221;, and you&#8217;ll get a decent list, but ask it any form of &#8220;largest american cities&#8221;, and it&#8217;ll stare back at you dumbly.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a glorified calculator that can pull data from almanacs&#8211;and since Google seems to be adding that ability soon anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

