<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speakenzie Search?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writtenbyallof.us/2009/03/27/speakenzie-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writtenbyallof.us/2009/03/27/speakenzie-search/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:06:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Slack</title>
		<link>http://writtenbyallof.us/2009/03/27/speakenzie-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Slack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writtenbyallof.us/?p=700#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>Before the dot.com boom, Rich, you never saw b2b or B2B used. It was business-to-business marketing, business marketing or b-to-b marketing. When the quick-buck VCs, business-school grads and technologists circa 1998 started creating all those online industry e-commerce portals and exchanges that were going to reinvent business commerce, for whatever reason (perhaps just to be different) they started using the b2b and B2B nomenclature. In fact, for a time, whenever I talked about b-to-b marketing, some people would assume we were an e-commerce firm, as though 100 years of business marketing was lost on them. I drank the Kool-Aid, too, and used b2b for a while (and still do occasionally). I even remember writing a note to Ad Age&#039;s David Klein weighing in that they&#039;d made a mistake in renaming Business Marketing magazine BtoB instead of B2B, as the latter was coming into greater use, so I told him somewhat authoritatively as I recall. In retrospect, I&#039;m glad David and Crain&#039;s went with and stuck with BtoB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before the dot.com boom, Rich, you never saw b2b or B2B used. It was business-to-business marketing, business marketing or b-to-b marketing. When the quick-buck VCs, business-school grads and technologists circa 1998 started creating all those online industry e-commerce portals and exchanges that were going to reinvent business commerce, for whatever reason (perhaps just to be different) they started using the b2b and B2B nomenclature. In fact, for a time, whenever I talked about b-to-b marketing, some people would assume we were an e-commerce firm, as though 100 years of business marketing was lost on them. I drank the Kool-Aid, too, and used b2b for a while (and still do occasionally). I even remember writing a note to Ad Age&#8217;s David Klein weighing in that they&#8217;d made a mistake in renaming Business Marketing magazine BtoB instead of B2B, as the latter was coming into greater use, so I told him somewhat authoritatively as I recall. In retrospect, I&#8217;m glad David and Crain&#8217;s went with and stuck with BtoB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Harder</title>
		<link>http://writtenbyallof.us/2009/03/27/speakenzie-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Harder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writtenbyallof.us/?p=700#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting problem. Way back in my early years, I worked with a librarian whose sole function was to create a catalog of keywords for a series of images we shot. It&#039;s amazing what she had to go through to make sure it was all easy to find. So, I totally get this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting problem. Way back in my early years, I worked with a librarian whose sole function was to create a catalog of keywords for a series of images we shot. It&#8217;s amazing what she had to go through to make sure it was all easy to find. So, I totally get this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

