<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From the blogs &#8211; Marketing Trends, Web Design, and No Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writtenbyallof.us/2008/06/26/from-the-blogs-marketing-trends-web-design-and-no-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writtenbyallof.us/2008/06/26/from-the-blogs-marketing-trends-web-design-and-no-windows/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:06:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Woelker</title>
		<link>http://writtenbyallof.us/2008/06/26/from-the-blogs-marketing-trends-web-design-and-no-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Woelker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writtenbyallof.us/2008/06/26/from-the-blogs-marketing-trends-web-design-and-no-windows/#comment-533</guid>
		<description>Hey Clay,
Thanks for the link. I did actually see that. Flash definitely has it&#039;s uses, but this effort by Adobe stinks of &quot;We&#039;re trying to gain wider adoption&quot;, but at the end of the day, I&#039;m still not going to recommend to clients with large websites which need to be accessible, to use Flash for anything more than &quot;fluffery&quot;. If you need to visual large datasets, I think there is a place for Flash. If you need deep interaction, I think there is a place for Flash. If you need deep searchable content, why would you use Flash?

Anyone else?
Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Clay,<br />
Thanks for the link. I did actually see that. Flash definitely has it&#8217;s uses, but this effort by Adobe stinks of &#8220;We&#8217;re trying to gain wider adoption&#8221;, but at the end of the day, I&#8217;m still not going to recommend to clients with large websites which need to be accessible, to use Flash for anything more than &#8220;fluffery&#8221;. If you need to visual large datasets, I think there is a place for Flash. If you need deep interaction, I think there is a place for Flash. If you need deep searchable content, why would you use Flash?</p>
<p>Anyone else?<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay Parker Jones</title>
		<link>http://writtenbyallof.us/2008/06/26/from-the-blogs-marketing-trends-web-design-and-no-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Parker Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writtenbyallof.us/2008/06/26/from-the-blogs-marketing-trends-web-design-and-no-windows/#comment-532</guid>
		<description>Jeeves -

&lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/01/1220232&amp;from=rss&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Have you seen this?&lt;/a&gt;

Well, sweet. Go Flash sites!

- Clay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeeves -</p>
<p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/01/1220232&amp;from=rss" rel="nofollow">Have you seen this?</a></p>
<p>Well, sweet. Go Flash sites!</p>
<p>- Clay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

